In some countries a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount of people can earn.
Discuss both view and give your opinion
Salary and benefits have emerged as the foremost contemporary concerns in the entire society. There are various discussions about the unbalanced earning in society. The employees have suggested that the policy makers should control the salaries between employees. This paper will discuss both views and provide a static opinion for the given issues.
According to a report published by the World Bank in 2021, the mean of income in Vietnam is $2,000 dollars per month. Therefore, the employees who earn higher than that range could be considered as the high incomes, while those of lower than $2000 dollars are counted as low incomes. The high incomes are usually the people who hold a minimum of senior level in the enterprise while the low incomes are the new graduates and the junior staffs. This is relatively fair because they will be paid for the workload and the responsibilities in their jobs. The higher pay rates, the more stressful and sacrifices to complete the tasks given by the company. To sum up, for the given reasons, extremely high wages must be given to the senior levels who have higher responsibilities than the executive levels.
Extremely high salaries are one of the human resources strategic tools to attract and retain the highest talents and scare human resources. For example, in some critical areas such as data scientist which have limited talents in both national and international. Therefore, offering them high salaries and attractive reimbursement will potentially create an ideal place to recruit them. This strategy is based on the ideal theory of extrinsic motivation. Extrinsic motivation rewards the employees with wages, benefits, and compensation.
However, there would be negative consequences of unbalanced pay rates in society. One of them is the income gap which creates the rich-and-poor gap in society. This gap has emerged in both developed and emerging economies. Some contemporary issues such as lack of houses, healthcare accessibility, educational services, and the diminished transportation infrastructures. Therefore, to obstacles these issues, policy makers have suggested the government to issue the personal income tax law based on the percentage of salaries they receive with the purpose of reducing the gap and use the taxes to support the public services.
In conclusion, high salaries would be an ideal strategy to attract human resources and motivate the employees. It encourages and attracts talents to contribute to the development of firms and nations. With the arising negative to the public services caused by extremely high wages, the government has issued some legislations and policies to control and create a better working condition for the people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-23 | andrew.dang | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | lakhveer khokhar | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | lakhveer khokhar | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-09 | lakhveer khokhar | 71 | view |
| 2021-09-02 | lakhveer khokhar | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...n 2021, the mean of income in Vietnam is ,000 dollars per month. Therefore, the em...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2301.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 429.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36363636364 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91939593423 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51048951049 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 727.2 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4121224957 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.043478261 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.652173913 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73913043478 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221269338957 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548097367989 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435124324155 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120838708258 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046330130936 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.