The percentage of 3 types of crimes: car theft, house burglary & street robbery in England & Wales from 1970 to 2015.
The line graph given compares England & Wales in terms of the proportion of three distinct kinds of crimes: car theft, house break-in and street robbery over a period of 45 years from 1970 to 2015.
It is evident from the graph that throughout the research period, local theives were prone to steal cars. Additionally, an oscillating trend was recorded in all categories.
In 1970, the proportion of car stealing accounted for 0.4% of the total, which outnumbered that of street robbery by four to one, at approximately 0.1%. Meanwhile, the share of house burglary was dwarfed by that of car theft, at roughly 0.1%.
To 1965, these countries witnessed a tremendous increase in the rate of car theft to 1.4% and reached the peak of the chart, at which point it started to slacken to 0.8 % in 2000. At the same time, after having undergone a minimal growth to exactly 0.6%, the percentage of house break-in dropped marginally to 0.4%, accompanied by fluctuations seen in the figure for street robbery to about 0.1%, which made it remain the least common type of crime in these nations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-01 | vuhungbo | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 44 | view |
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works Summariez the infomation by selecting and reporting the main features 56
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 84
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries Why What will be effects on society 73
- The diagram below shows how the orange juice is produced 73
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85483870968 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63492298729 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623655913978 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.9690893852 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5714285714 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 5.23603664747 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406004206611 0.215688989381 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146387180942 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116937320951 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209924433965 0.15604864568 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124777426746 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.