The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
There are two types of data are available. The first one in the column bar chart described how much money was earned by a particular nation in billions when they export different categories of products all around the world over a year of 2015 and 2016, While, table data describe that their are some increment and decrement arise in how many percentage of product was sell around world in 2016 compare with 2015.
The petroleum sector play huge role in country economy and more than 60 billions dollar was earn by this category and it was highest out of all. It is noticed that exactly 3 percentage increased in petroleum chemical product demand. Whereas, a nation earn small amount of money from textiles market. But there are huge demand in this category in the year of 2016 and that was 13. 24 percentage more demand than 2015.
Furthermore, agriculture product and textile market look like same in 2016. But 0.81 percentage was increased in demand for agriculture product and it was negligible. There are also increment in export of engineered goods item in 2016 and that was 8.5%. While, germs and jewellery sector is slightly different from other because requirement of product was decrease in year of 2016 and it was 5.8 percentage.
Overall, a nation earned more amount of money though petroleum. While, textile was lowest in exporting items. In addition, 15.24 percentage of more requirements in export items in year of 2016 rather than 2015. But 5.18% decrement was notice in germs and jewellery sector in 2016.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries to tourist information office made by telephone letter email and in person from January 2001 to June 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relev 84
- The graphs below show the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 67
- We learn through direct experience to accept a theory without experiencing it is to learn nothing at all 66
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 71
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...d 2016, While, table data describe that their are some increment and decrement arise ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun percentage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many percentages'.
Suggestion: many percentages
...me increment and decrement arise in how many percentage of product was sell around world in 201...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'earned'.
Suggestion: earned
...my and more than 60 billions dollar was earn by this category and it was highest out...
^^^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d in petroleum chemical product demand. Whereas, a nation earn small amount of money fr...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ement of product was decrease in year of 2016 and it was 5.8 percentage. Overa...
^^
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... more amount of money though petroleum. While, textile was lowest in exporting items....
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, so, well, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9111969112 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52727994109 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498069498069 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.0 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 78.618629401 43.030603864 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210978806567 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759990562692 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681686186893 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14784093894 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493110524596 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...d 2016, While, table data describe that their are some increment and decrement arise ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun percentage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many percentages'.
Suggestion: many percentages
...me increment and decrement arise in how many percentage of product was sell around world in 201...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'earned'.
Suggestion: earned
...my and more than 60 billions dollar was earn by this category and it was highest out...
^^^^
Line 3, column 234, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d in petroleum chemical product demand. Whereas, a nation earn small amount of money fr...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ement of product was decrease in year of 2016 and it was 5.8 percentage. Overa...
^^
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... more amount of money though petroleum. While, textile was lowest in exporting items....
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, so, well, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 259.0 196.424390244 132% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9111969112 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52727994109 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498069498069 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.0 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 78.618629401 43.030603864 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210978806567 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759990562692 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681686186893 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14784093894 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493110524596 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.