Traditional museums served as knowledge centre for historical and cultural aspects, with the increasing use of internet museums have become obsolete.
Do you agree or disagree?
It is a fact that museums are main source, which represents our history and culture, but because of technology museums are less popular among people and specially traditional museums. However, there are many reasons behind this phenomenon. I will discuss all the relevant points in upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, there are ample or reasons, why people switch their mode to get traditional information related to history and culture. The most remarkable reason is hectic life style, people have limited time for going outside for tour, so in this situation they prefer to go for picnic with there family and friends, they deem that visiting old museums is wast of time because all the relative information easily available in internet, so they read it to get knowledge related to Asian culture without visiting museums. Apart from these nowadays museums authorities creat their own websites for people to collect wild information related to their museums.
In addition, there are few reasons behind this issue. The most important reason is museums are lack attractive, so majority people avoid to visit. Another significant factor is entry fees are to high, so people believe that they get all the information from the internet without any cost then why they can pay of these place, it is wast of money as well. Last but far from least, the location of the traditional museums they located in remote areas and one museum is too far from another one, it is very difficult to visit every museum.
Therefore on the basis of all the points till and my personal experience as well. I would like to state in conclusion that people deem that knowledge is important not the venue. I personally believe that the authorities should take care about all there museums and organise some public events for local people to increase popularity.
- The line graph below show the consumption of 3 different types of fast food in Britain from 1970 to 1990 80
- The changes in town from toady to upcoming time 67
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960 1980 and 2000 73
- Traditional museums served as knowledge centre for historical and cultural aspects with the increasing use of internet museums have become obsolete Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some children spend hours everyday on their smartphones Why is this case Do you think is a positive or a negative development 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... they deem that visiting old museums is wast of time because all the relative inform...
^^^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y available in internet, so they read it to get knowledge related to Asian cultur...
^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid visiting'.
Suggestion: avoid visiting
...are lack attractive, so majority people avoid to visit. Another significant factor is entry fe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: TO_TOO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...er significant factor is entry fees are to high, so people believe that they get a...
^^
Line 5, column 333, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... why they can pay of these place, it is wast of money as well. Last but far from lea...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ry difficult to visit every museum. Therefore on the basis of all the points till and...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, apart from, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03267973856 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5243823603 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552287581699 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.5944092651 49.4020404114 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.461538462 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190657559414 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603956174564 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541473592189 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115069299241 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254019543554 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.