Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is undeniable that history is an important part of society. Some people think that all students in universities should be required to pass history courses. However, I believe there are some essential courses that students should study in university. To support this, there are several reasons, two of which are going to be explored in the following.
First and foremost, students need to pass technical courses that are related to their majors in their university for being a professional person in the future. It means people are professionals that know everything about doing their jobs. Knowing about history cannot help an engineer who is worked in a refinery or other companies. They can read history books in their free time but it is not necessary for improving their job level. My experience can clarify this viewpoint. About ten years ago, when I was a student at a university, my major was chemical engineering. I had to pass all courses related to my major such as heat transfer, mass transfer, process control, and so on. Now I am working as a process safety engineer which is totally related to the major that I graduated from. If I did not pass those courses, I could not succeed in my job.
Second, memorable courses are not suitable for all students because maybe some students do not have a good memory to remember history. It is an important point that all students do not have the same talent to remember some memorable courses like history, and universities should not force students to take history courses. Because it can cause students to have to tolerate a lot of mental and physical pressure to pass these lessons. Also, they may leave their universities because it is hard for them. Based on the above example, if my university forced me to take history courses, without any doubt, I would stop studying immediately. Because I do not have a good memory to remember theoretical courses.
To wrap it up, I strongly believe that all university students do not need to take history courses. This is because students need technical courses for their future job and all students do not have a good memory to remember history courses.
- These days people enjoy a lot of time away from their work and school obligations Many people use this time to visit new places and learn about them What do you think is the best way to learn about a place you are visiting for the first time 396 words a G 80
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?a) Interrupt and correct the mistake right away, b) Wait until the class or meeti 60
- Everyone wants to be as healthy as possible Fortunately in modern society there are many things that people can do to improve their physical condition What do you think is the best way to stay healthy a Get exercise on a regular basis b Eat healthy food e 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? The knowledge we gain from personal experience is more valuable than the experience we gain from book. 60
- Some parents offer their children-age school money for each high grade they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 637, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ubt, I would stop studying immediately. Because I do not have a good memory to remember...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 370.0 407.700716846 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83783783784 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67229379506 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472972972973 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 579.6 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.8773297263 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2380952381 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.619047619 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.61904761905 5.45110844103 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260563334532 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864791577763 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721605553022 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191452329172 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483572988632 0.0645574589148 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.