The graphs below show the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017

Essay topics:

The graphs below show the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.

The below line graph describes how many numbers of visitors visited Caribbean island between 2010 to 2017 and also shows how many numbers of travelers stay on cruise ships, and on island and total of the visitors.

From the year of 2010 to 2011 increment arises in how many numbers of visitors stayed on cruise ships and that goes to 0.5 millions. Whereas, who takes accommodation on the island remained in the first one year and that was 1.5 million people. But after one year some downward trend arises in those who stayed in cruise ships.

Now we turn into what happened after 2012. There are gradually increment arise in both categories but in the category of who stayed on island remained the stable from 2013 to 2015. Whereas, there is no fall notice in who stayed in cruise ships till the end of 2017.

In addition, exactly 3.5 million people visited a Caribbean island till 2017 out of this 2 million people staying in cruise ships and remaining else stayed on the island.

Overall, the proportion of stayed in the ship is more than those who stayed on the island from 2011 to mid 2015. But in 2017 exactly 0.5 million people more than who stayed on the island.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-14 Zahid6400 61 view
2024-04-14 soomi2209 61 view
2024-03-11 MinyiChu 67 view
2024-02-04 Saul 67 view
2024-01-14 Ahmad_off 67 view
Essays by user shalin63 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in those who stayed in cruise ships. Now we turn into what happened after 201...
^^^
Line 5, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... remained the stable from 2013 to 2015. Whereas, there is no fall notice in who stayed ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, whereas, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62857142857 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19731850599 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471428571429 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4261531225 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237184409155 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963951308225 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125904926118 0.0843802449381 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16003903588 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148862455861 0.0819641961636 182% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.71 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.