It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The provision of higher education for young people has remained a debatable topic throughout the years. Opinions divide on whether or not it is feasible to provide a significant portion of the youth with the opportunity to go to universities. I personally believe that giving too many young people the chance to pursue higher education is an impossible and ineffective task.
Firstly, the alarmingly high number of students will negatively affect the quality of both universities and students. For example, many students who come from poorer backgrounds go to public universities, in which the tuition fees are supported by the governments. However, as more and more students wish to go to college, the governments’ funds might not be sufficient enough to ensure the quality of public universities’ curricula and infrastructure, leading to their downgrade. Furthermore, is argued that learning in a classroom with too many students is not as effective as learning in a classroom with fewer students. Therefore, universities should limit the number of students they take in.
Secondly, not all people are suitable for the university environment. Universities prepare students for their future jobs by providing in-depth knowledge about their chosen careers through lectures and seminars. However, many people learn better through actual experiences. For instance, a person who has a technical mind and is interested in cooking may be able to learn more quickly by spending more time in the kitchen instead of going to college. In addition, there are many famous figures who have found success without getting their diplomas, namely Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg. If university places are made available to anyone, a lot of students will end up in a place where they do not truly belong.
In conclusion, I believe that providing university places to too many young people should be discouraged for the reasons above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-29 | Nyahmeo | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | quynhanhbuiviet | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | quynhanhbuiviet | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | quynhanhbuiviet | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | quynhanhbuiviet | 67 | view |
- In today s job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge In the future job applicants may not need any formal qualifications To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Nowadays children watch a lot of TV and play video games However some think that these activities are not beneficial for a child s mental health To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Nowadays children watch a lot of TV and play video games However some think that these activities are not beneficial for a child s mental health To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...hroughout the years. Opinions divide on whether or not it is feasible to provide a significant...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...nd seminars. However, many people learn better through actual experiences. For instanc...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34539473684 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04059666826 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569078947368 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3212410791 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.333333333 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188799353658 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709874441736 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614851076676 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138598693117 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605236480578 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.