Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time.
Discuss both views and state your opinion.
In today’s fast-paced world, everyone has different perspectives towards money and time. Some people believe that having a good bank balance and fewer leisure hours is better for leading life. At the same time, others adhere to radically opposite views. Both these views have positive and negative aspects, and I believe that an individual should not compromise with the quality of life for money.
It is believed that money in cash or property has a significant impact on one’s life. This is because it lets an individual buy anything and everything followed by fulfilling all the basic financial obligations and giving one the privilege of living a luxurious life. As a result, it is possible to lead a stress-free life with a great bank balance. Without money, an individual will not be able to live either a luxurious or comfortable life. Therefore, individuals work day and night to produce more money, and compromise with leisure hours.
On the contrary, some people opine that spending long hours at work and not prioritizing time to enjoy life is not the correct outlook towards life. They consider time to be the most precious resource and value it more than money as it will more likely provide them with a stress-free and productive life. They believe that one can use the time to make money but can’t use the same money to purchase more time, which is indeed true. Furthermore, it is possible to lose all the money and get it back again, but it is impossible to retrieve the lost time and spend it with loved ones. As a result, they advocate the school of thought that earning less and prioritizing more time can be the best way to live a healthier life.
To conclude, although it’s difficult, people should strive to strike a balance by prioritizing their time and money equally because wealth alone cannot buy happiness and healthy relations. According to me, people who earn sufficient money and socialize with people live a happier life than those who earn higher incomes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-29 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2020-07-18 | Jaskaran Kaur | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-07 | Mariamirabella | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | Tolik | 62 | view |
- Some children receive almost no encouragement from their parents regarding their performance at school while other children receive too much pressure from their over enthusiastic parents which can have negative impacts on the child Why do you think some p 73
- Nowadays more and more children play computer games Why do you think this is the case Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Some people think that space exploration is a waste of resources while others think that it is essential for mankind to continue to explore the universe in which we live Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- As computers translate quickly and accurately learning foreign language is a waste of time To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that space exploration is a waste of resources while others think that it is essential for mankind to continue to explore the universe in which we live Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...ot buy happiness and healthy relations. According to me, people who earn sufficient money and s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60868260114 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526470588235 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.207518211 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322592904021 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104586948677 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0640970465425 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185057922258 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803681281752 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.