MIT Emerging Talent is an open multicultural community and does not discriminate on gender, age, race and ethnicity, sexual orientation, religion, country of origin, or nationality. What do you think are the challenges and advantages of studying and interacting with people with different belief systems and cultural backgrounds? What do you think are the challenges and advantages of studying and interacting with people with different belief systems and cultural backgrounds?
Different is not bad, it is for the best. The way folk vary from one another is a mysterious and adventurous pathway in the name of getting to know our own kinds more vivid and transparent. I personally stand against all sorts of discriminations and severely disagree any interrelated topics with prejudice and its belongings. Initially, in a combinational group of various people, social intelligence enhances aids up ameliorate the way we get along with a diversity of people. Besides, this strike adds up to our general knowledge, awareness of tactfulness which are utterly astonishing. There, of course, will be challenges to get through, albeit the moral of story is way valuable and charming to focus on. Versatility and flexibility are indeed required to deal up with people, yet the odor of understanding and perception is the main ingredient for each and every peaceful social interaction.
The most common and inevitable challenges that we may possibly face would consist of disagreements and misunderstandings. But for sure these a sort of easily-solved debates that can be settled down logically, particularly when it comes to an academic environment. The point is that everyone’s personal perspective is highly respected, for we need to stay rational and reasonable. In a nutshell, albeit human beings differ from one another, it does not mean that we should stand in front of each other. We are supposed to stand shoulder by shoulder and learn how to cooperate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-10 | Mahshid_lip | 3 | view |
- How social media benefit people 60
- How social media benefit people 60
- MIT Emerging Talent is an open multicultural community and does not discriminate on gender age race and ethnicity sexual orientation religion country of origin or nationality What do you think are the challenges and advantages of studying and interacting 3
- how social media benefit people 70
- How social media benefit people 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 51, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'may', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: may; possibly
...ommon and inevitable challenges that we may possibly face would consist of disagreements and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 51, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'may'.
Suggestion: may
...ommon and inevitable challenges that we may possibly face would consist of disagreements and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, so, of course, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 1977.66487455 63% => OK
No of words: 240.0 407.700716846 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1625 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 4.48103885553 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24762466616 2.67179642975 122% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.65 0.524837075471 124% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 618.680645161 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8060942982 48.9658058833 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.45110844103 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.53405017921 44% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.031287502387 0.236089414692 13% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0107578587874 0.076458572812 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0127815763779 0.0737576698707 17% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0248001149887 0.150856017488 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00790194321189 0.0645574589148 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.