Nowadays, there is a trend that reports of media focus on problems and emergencies rather than positive development. Some people think it is harmful to individuals and to society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this current era, media has become the popular and quick medium to showcase any issue or urgency rather than doing any assertive enhancement. It is often argued that this is a harmful approach for any person as well as to the community while others think that these channel must follow their protocol. This essay agrees that media may create a harmful impact on any citizen or society due to their priority setup. This article will discuss both views.
It is certain that relying on media may create a wrong impact on anybody which does not help in providing proper positive solutions. People tend to use several online channels to share their news. But ultimately, this does not help to bring any desired solutions except bringing others attention. Hence, this essay agrees that media increases other issues rather than ensuring solutions. For example, lots of incorrect news are getting broadcasted or being shared by people which only creates a bad imprint.
However, in other hand, media believes in following their protocol to showcase several issues among people. They promote that news through different social media channels to get maximum people's click. But, this does not assist to bring possible solutions to that problem. Indirectly, this creates negative effects on folks or society. This essay disagrees that protocol should not be the 1st step for media. For instance, to follow the official protocol, people are not getting on-time help during floods or earthquakes.
Nowadays, report of different media keeps their eye on delivering the personal issues or emergencies instead of providing desired help. Therefore, in my opinion, all telecast channels should consider the help as their 1st priority rather than protocol.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-23 | mehjabin | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | SharmisthaNaskar | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | shain | 67 | view |
| 2020-04-06 | ielts_gt_na | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | aycorek | 61 | view |
- We have been living in the nuelear age now for over half a century. Since the first atomic bombs were developed, nuclear technology has provided governments with the ability to totally destroy the planet. Yet the technology has been put to positive use as 61
- Should long term job seekers in receipt of government benefits be made to do voluntary work so that they give something back to the community Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge experience 56
- You have a full time job and you are also doing a part time evening course You now find that you cannot continue the course Write a letter to your teachers In your letter describe the situation explain why you cannot continue at this time 73
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 89
- In cities and towns all over the world the high volume of traffic is a problem What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25357142857 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4123169276 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578571428571 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.812382521 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5294117647 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164364718559 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543034727506 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400116558178 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103714620237 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155615846605 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25357142857 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4123169276 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578571428571 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.812382521 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5294117647 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4705882353 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88235294118 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164364718559 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543034727506 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400116558178 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103714620237 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0155615846605 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.