The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart delineates the ratio of pupils who continue their education for the benefit of their career and from passion, based on their age groups while the line graph reveals the support those students got from their companies as a form of financial support and time off.
Overall, young students’ main focus for education is their career while it was mostly passion for elder learners. Moreover, young students below 30 years of age received more support from their employers.
To illustrate, eight of ten people under 26 years old continue education for their career. Only 10% of them do it from passion. Interestingly, the higher the age, the more eager they become to study for personal interest, not for professional reasons. Seven out of ten people who are at least 50 years old study for interest. Finally, these two factors equally motivate people from 40-49 years old to further their learning.
The second diagram shows that young employees who were younger than 30 years old, got more backing from their employers while the least support is expected for workers between 30 to 39 years old. However, it is interesting to notice that employers were more sympathetic to workers over 40 years old than they were to employees in their thirties.
- the pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people claim that not enough waste from homes is recycled and that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 26, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...time off. Overall, young students’ main focus for education is their career while it ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...49 years old to further their learning. The second diagram shows that young empl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, moreover, second, so, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00947867299 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44689331568 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57345971564 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7150677972 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.7 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187286427214 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849830853069 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530344443164 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129737649327 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473130367605 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.