The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The given bar chart demonstrates the total quantity of minutes (in billions) spent on three different types of telephone calls in the UK during the period 1995-2002.
Overall, for the first five-year period, the duration of all types of phone calls witnessed a significant increase. However, between 1999 and 2002, there was a remarkable drop in the calling minutes of the local landlines.
Looking at the chart in more detail, in 1995, it is clear that the local landline recorded the highest total call time, at over 70 billion minutes. Meanwhile, the length of calls made via national and international - fixed lines and mobiles came second and third in the call list respectively, at 38 billion and 4 billion minutes. During the next four years, the figures for all three types underwent a gradual increase, with the duration of calls using the local-fixed line reaching an all-time high of 90 billion minutes in 1999.
In the period 1999-2002 the amount of time spent on the local landline, however, experienced a significant decrease from 90 billion to its initial point of 72 billion minutes. On the other hand, the duration of calls via national and international -fixed lines, as well as mobiles, continued to rise steadily, reaching in turn 60 billion and 45 billion minutes by the end of the given timeframe.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, second, third, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98190045249 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7094248236 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570135746606 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 325.8 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.7727395634 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.625 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 5.23603664747 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296025605501 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141590194638 0.103423049105 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986287801649 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208755422361 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107908957644 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.