Some people believe that success in creative fields, such as painting, fiction writing, and filmmaking, primarily requires hard work and perseverance. Others believe that such success mainly requires innate talents that cannot be learned.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The success in creative fields is linked to a number of reasons. They are mostly categorized as external or external factors. Internal factors are the innate skills and talent acquired since birth and external factors are the efforts made by individuals. While innate talents are important, success in creative fields is mainly achieved by the individual efforts. As such, the first view closes aligns with my position on this argument.
Considering an painter artist, indeed talents is what set him on the path to be coming a successful artist, it is not enough to keep him on that path. An artist has to be hardworking and diligent because any success that does not go with personal effort is often fleeting. For example, an artist setting out to have his work displayed in art galleries would have to assiduously paint as many works as he can to make a positive first impression in the mind of audiences and customers. This is where hard work and diligence comes into play and its effect over talent is more noticed.
Also perseverance is also is a very important individual character that a novelist (fiction writer) must have. A report on interviews of famous novelists show that the first books of currently successful novelist were often rejected by publishing houses and flim makers. The most notable is perhaps J. K. Rowlings, the author of the famous Harry Potter series, who was most times rejected by publishing houses during her initial years as a writer. Without perseverance she would have given up and the world would not have gotten to know about her talent as a writer. This shows that talent is best appreciated when there is a history of perseverance dedication.
Although, innate talent may sometimes considered to be a deciding factor for success in the creative field because it give a better understanding of the intricate details of the field. In modern days, almost most is impossibile to learn to the point expertise. Furthermore, with individual efforts artists better appreciate their talent and strive to make it better in every way possible.
In conclusion, a successful career in the creative fields require both innate talent as well as hard work and dedication. But it is with hard work and perseverance that talent is better appreciated to bring success. Without these talent remains undeveloped and under appreciated by the artist and most especially by the public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-07 | batterylow_123 | 30 | view |
| 2024-06-07 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2024-06-07 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2024-06-07 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | TiOluwani97 | 58 | view |
- The following memo was published by the Welzaton City Commission A recent nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a safety helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whe 63
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects What is specific to these online encyclopedias how 87
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting you 50
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 50
- Claim Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills Reason These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...sition on this argument. Considering an painter artist, indeed talents is what ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...effect over talent is more noticed. Also perseverance is also is a very importan...
^^^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gives'?
Suggestion: gives
...uccess in the creative field because it give a better understanding of the intricate...
^^^^
Line 9, column 86, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ative fields require both innate talent as well as hard work and dedication. But it is wit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 187, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'appreciated bringing'.
Suggestion: appreciated bringing
... and perseverance that talent is better appreciated to bring success. Without these talent remains u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, may, so, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 401.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01995012469 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75235135179 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531172069825 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1992558769 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8571428571 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0952380952 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249727719287 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770457169654 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773724081088 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146850412587 0.150359130593 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066875871874 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.