Percentage of total music sales by method
The line graphs below illustrate the percentage of total music sales through 3 methods: stream, CDs purchased, and download from 2011 to 2018.
Overall, there was a decline sharply in the proportion of downloads and CDs purchased. Whereas the figures of streaming climbed admirably over the period shown.
It is obvious that CDs had the highest percentage out of the other different graphs at about 55% in 2011, while the downloads approximately 35%. These figures continued reduce above 40% in 2014. After 4 years, people who bought CDs still fell down 1,5 times compared with 2014. Whereas the downloads increased slightly to 41% at the same time. However, the percentage of people who download music reduced, and these figures in 2018 were even lower than in 2011.
At first, streaming platforms did not too unpopular in 2011, this figure started at only 5%. But over time, this platform rose steadily and did not have indicated stop, while 2 other ways to listen to music dropped. And listeners to music still keep on supporting their favorite artists through streaming platforms. This the figure reached a peak of 41% in 2018. This proportion of streams took the lead on the line graph in 2018.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-29 | trpg143 | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-11-22 | trpg143 | 73 | view |
- The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001 67
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 73
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990 78
- The bar chart shows the percentages of the UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011 78
- Average annual spending on mobile phones domestic and international fixed services 2001 2010 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 87, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...portion of downloads and CDs purchased. Whereas the figures of streaming climbed admira...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...fell down 1,5 times compared with 2014. Whereas the downloads increased slightly to 41%...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, still, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95544554455 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48349615692 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618811881188 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.1113670507 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.0 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5384615385 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146978658412 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483254323973 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834911037183 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108839043769 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114483279675 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.