The tables below give the distribution of world population in 1950 and 2000, with an estimate of the situation in 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The tables illustrate how the world population has changed and distributed in other areas from 1950 to 2000 and an estimation of 2050.
Overall, there is an increase in the percentage of the world population in africa, asia, and latin america, while the figures for europe and north america witness a decline and that one in oceania is almost unchanged. In addition, the world population has dramatically increased throughout the period.
The global population started at 2.5 billion, before ending the period at 6.0 billion which is expected to significantly rise to 9 billion in 2050.
22% of inhabitants accommodated in europe in 1950, with a subsequent decrease to 12% in 2000. Likewise, the figures for latin and north america dropped slightly from 6%(1950) to 9%(2000) and 7%(1950) to 5%(2000) respectively. On the contrary, the number of residents in asia grew from 56% in 1950 to 60% at the end of the period, which was also seen in the proportion of its in africa with an increase reaching 13% in 1950. Moreover, the figure for oceania remained unchanged at about 1% in the period examined.
By 2050, the share of people in oceania and latin america is likely to level off. Meanwhile, the proportion of inhabitants in africa is predicted to rise, reaching 20%. Conversely, the figures for asia, europe, and north america are projected to decrease by an average of 3% to end at 59%, 7%, and 4% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | an mai hương | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | dorae | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-04 | Đặng Luân | 56 | view |
| 2020-09-26 | ismatjahan | view | |
| 2020-09-26 | ismatjahan | 90 | view |
- Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere To what extent do you agree with this view 84
- The tables below give the distribution of world population in 1950 and 2000 with an estimate of the situation in 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The pictures below shows process of growing and making products from pineapples 73
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- IN SOME COUNTRIES MOST PEOPLE PREFER TO RENT THEIR HOMES RATHER THAN BUYING THEM WHAT ARE THE ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF RANTING A HOME 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...0 to 2000 and an estimation of 2050. Overall, there is an increase in the per...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lly increased throughout the period. The global population started at 2.5 bil...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ificantly rise to 9 billion in 2050. 22% of inhabitants accommodated in europ...
^^^
Line 7, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r oceania remained unchanged at about 1% in the period examined. By 2050, t...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at about 1% in the period examined. By 2050, the share of people in oceania...
^^^
Line 9, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d. By 2050, the share of people in oceania and latin america is likely to l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, if, likewise, moreover, so, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91666666667 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82149487565 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529166666667 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8306270753 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.272727273 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192152933728 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825897232301 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086005324557 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128290927656 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105104706494 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.