The tables below give information about the world population and distribution in 1950 and 2000, with an estimate of the situation in 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given tables illustrate the population of the world and its sharing in 5 continents in every 50-year period from 1950 to 2050.
In general, the population of the world is predicted to bloom in 2050. While Asia is always the continent with the largest population, Oceania is the exact opposite.
In 1950 and 2000, Asia took the lead in the distribution of world population, at 56% and 60% in turn, whilst Oceania was at the bottom of this list, at around 1%. Furthermore, there was a decline in the percent of the population allocated in both Europe and North America; at the same time, Africa and Latin America saw a slight rise in the spreading of population.
In 2050, Asia is estimated to continue to head the list with approxiamately 60% and Oceania will still be in the last place with just 1%. Moreover, although the distribution in Africa is forecasted to rise to 20% in 2050, the population in North America and Europe is thought to fall down, at 4% and 7% respectively. Last but not least, the distribution in Latin America is believed to be sustainable at just under one-tenth percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-19 | dorae | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-17 | Candice987 | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-04 | Đặng Luân | 56 | view |
| 2022-05-07 | Jenil | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-17 | Rajan wahla | 73 | view |
- Most people think that the Internet is good others think that its disadvantages are more important What is your opinion Talking about the advantages and disadvantages of the Internet 73
- the recycling process of glass bottles 84
- People have different views on how to reduce traffic congestion Some think that governments should build more train and subway lines while others think that building more roads and widening existing roads will reduce traffic congestion Discuss both views 73
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The figures give information about economic growth and household expenditure across a range of categories Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, moreover, still, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69587628866 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81184976423 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510309278351 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8547350377 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.875 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158676008628 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0778133815752 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460431194838 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107014798766 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272443272463 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.