THE GRAPH SHOWS THE INCOME OF FOUR CAFE IN NEW YORK OVER LAST YEAR.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The graph illustrates the amount of money that four particular cafes earned in New York last year.
Generally, there was an upward trend in the data of income of most cafes, while the opposite was true for The Tea Room. Additionally, all the categories saw fluctuation during the given time.
Café Cool earned the lowest money in the first month, at 30,000 dollars, followed by Wi-fi Café, at 50,000 dollars. The figure for Café Cool then fluctuated before increasing to 50,000 dollars in August and ending the period at precisely 120,000 dollars. Besides, the income of Wi-fi Café became the highest data in four categories in December with about 190,000 dollars.
Meanwhile, the Tea Room’s revenues stood at 160,000 dollars in January, which is higher than its Internet Express counterpart 60,000 dollars. While Internet Express witnessed a slight drop in their money earned in the summer, at 80,000 dollars, the Tea Room’s figure experienced a swing and saw a significant decrease of 50,000 dollars in December. The opposite was seen in Internet Express’s data, which rose gradually to about 140,000 dollars in the final month.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-08 | chino0301 | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view | |
| 2024-11-04 | khanhkhanhlhp | view |
- In recent years more and more people are choosing to read e books rather than paper books Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of this trend 73
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The diagram shows the small scale production of smoked fish 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement 73
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19459459459 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54872746432 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589189189189 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4027968484 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0638162890124 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428217012125 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923065872021 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0857011648477 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122950990018 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.