The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
the diagram compares the outcome of data about people who live in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Hobart having habits to purchase and to drink coffee, tea as well in last 4 weeks.
Overall, people in Melbourne went to cafe for buying coffee and tea than other cities which was the highest percentage. Despite this, purchasing fresh coffee had a lower proportion in Brisbane than others.
In the beginning, coffee or tea was bought by individuals directly at cafe in Sydney about 61%. Then, it reached a peak at around 64% in Melbourne. In Brisbane and Adelaide, however, this was a smaller percentage in comparison with Hobart at under 60% and almost 65% respectively. While instant coffee was purchased by people in three cities under half. Finally, in two cities (Brisbane and Hobart) this was nearly more than half.
The proportion of purchasing fresh coffee in Sydney was approximately 44%. Meanwhile, the population living in Melbourne prefers to buy fresh coffee just under 40%, and just below 40% of people in Brisbane, Hobart, and Adelaide purchased it.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-09 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
2023-11-12 | Daniel3003 | 78 | view |
2023-08-28 | susanti | 78 | view |
2023-08-15 | anhalice | 67 | view |
2023-08-15 | Kaythlyn | 67 | view |
- the pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009 73
- the maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site
- Many adults nowadays prefer spending their free time playing computer games Is this a positive or negative development 61
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- the bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the diagram compares the outcome of data ab...
^^^
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... under 60% and almost 65% respectively. While instant coffee was purchased by people ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, so, then, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07344632768 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6518548714 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581920903955 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9661494668 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16371880328 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685802042505 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463928409171 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107169933124 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148307263878 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.