The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart compares the percentage of change in prices of copper, nickel and zinc in the year 2014.
It is clear that the trend for all three metals was relatively similar. A significant fall can be seen in the first six months and the prices increased again in the end of the year.
In the January of 2014, average monthly change in prices of copper, nickel and zinc were +2%, +6% and +1% respectively. While copper price change dropped steadily in the following five months to -0.5% in Jane, the figure for nickel decreased dramatically in the first three months and remained relatively stable in the next two months before falling considerably to -3%. In the contrast, the trend for zinc was the rise in February and a gradual decrease in the next five months.
In the following six months of 2014, the same changes happened for all three metals. The average monthly change was remained unchanged from July to September before a slight fall can be seen in October, and finally rose again in the end of the year. These figures for copper and zinc were +1.5% and +2.0% respectively, while nickel increased from -1.0% in October to +1.0% in December.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-25 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 73
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 957.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71428571429 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42984508813 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477832512315 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4116388678 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181157479724 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915747354396 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632219952569 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123776944757 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219560107903 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.