The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features. And make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph gives information about the number of stores that closed down and recently opened stores one country from 2011 to 2018. Overall, it can be seen that the number of shop closures and openings decreased by the end of the given period. In addition, both categories show a fluctuating trend.
In 2011, the number of boutiques that closed stood at over 6,000 and also fluctuated between roughly 6,000 and 7,000 boutiques during the first two years of the period, reaching a peak of just over 7,000. The figure of outlets that closed began to steadily fall to under 7,000 in 2014; thereafter, it began to suddenly decline, reaching a low of under 1,000 outlets in 2015. Furthermore, it began to rapidly rise to just over 5,000 in the following year and remained steady at this level from 2016 to 2018.
On the other hand, the number of stores that opened stood at above 8,000 in 2011, which resulted in 2,000 net openings. It began to dramatically fall, reaching a low of just below 4,000 in 2012. Starts rebounded, reaching nearly the same level as closings in 2014 at just over 6,000, after which the number of opened stores dropped again to its 2012 level in 2015, where it remained constant until it fell further to an all-time low at 3,000 in 2018.
- The chart below gives information about how families in 1 country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you thing this is a positive or a negative development 56
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 56
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, so, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66071428571 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31695998486 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549107142857 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9764548123 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191475619293 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091758668268 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780278438649 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163407817865 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10753962786 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.