Topic: As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensive, but more complex and mysterious.
Deep knowledge of any topic can be either too helpful or too harmful for any individual. Be it knowledge about some scientific mystery, historical tale, geographical feature, or the base of Mankind - Humanity. But, when we start digging up in the depth of truthful facts, adding to our knowledge, it often happens so that things do not become more comprehensive, but more complex and mysterious. Thus, I agree with the statement presented in the question, but I cannot fully support due to the "all or nothing" impression it gives.
To present my stand in a more detailed way, let me explain with an example. Any scientific mystery, be it about some Space expedition or a chemical reaction, it always turns out to be a mystery. Taking example of the current Chandrayaan-3 mission of India, we can it is lucid that just beginning with the idea of reaching the Southern pole of moon, today India’s ISRO has accomplished the dreams of several power houses of the world. But it does not stop here, things have not become simpler now, Rather there are news of further analysis of the southern pole of moon, as one accomplishment leads to way more questions, doubts and several predictions that make the complete topic complex and mysterious. Even when we look at the history behind the famous Laws of Newton, we can see that as the scientists dug deeper to get more and more knowledge, it was never a mere simple fact.
Another significant example is of Humanity: its basics, the problems underlying it, and the solutions that itself turns into a question. So, as it is limpid that the secrets behind Humanity have always been the talk of the town. Its basics, that include human behaviour, likes and dislikes, characteristics, intelligence and quite literally everything else has been talked about. To highlight one of them, let me pick up human behaviour. Recently since the last decade, there have been several trends about changes in human behavior, involvement of mental problems, like depression, suicidal anxieties, and even classic ones like LGBTC. As we research deep to gain more knowledge, things keep on adding up, making it more and more confusing. For example, mental illness earlier was considered a reason of stress, which has now branched and sub-branched into depression, suicidal thoughts, career pressure, parental pressure, bullying, and so much more. Even in Depression, it sub-branches into several complications like sleep disorder, suffocations, distress, fever, dizziness, etc.
But here in this example, I would like to make the point that sometimes these mysteries and complexities, give us a comprehensive answer to several puzzles. Like so much pressure on Human behaviour gave opened doors for studies and research in topics like depression, that led to allowing patients to visit doctor to feel, without any fear of social stigmas. It made the things way clearer than it was earlier, making citizens known of the kind of health issues that are not having common symptoms like cold and fever.
Thus, to conclude my stand on the statement made, I can say that I partially agree with it, as it makes literally everything more mysterious and complex making it difficult to be hacked and understood. Several topics might also take decades or more to be uncovered from the complexities they behold. But, on the other hand, there are also examples of situations where these complexities themselves give way to a more comprehensive understanding of the niche and extremely important topic, like mental health.
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- Task 1 The maps below show the center of a small town called Berkshire as it is now and plans for its development Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 58
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns w 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 137, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , as” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ions that itself turns into a question. So, as it is limpid that the secrets behind Hu...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1083, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ations, distress, fever, dizziness, etc. But here in this example, I would like t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, thus, for example, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2964.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 582.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09278350515 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91168771031 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86589667899 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 315.0 215.323595506 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541237113402 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 919.8 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2297499948 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.869565217 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3043478261 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04347826087 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339639910184 0.243740707755 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915031897282 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113921840416 0.0758088955206 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192421005824 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844705969474 0.0667264976115 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 100.480337079 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.