People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
__________
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Decision-making is a responsibility that often holds the power to make or break your life. Every day, every moment, we tend to make several decisions, be it as small as which dress to wear or as big as which career or job to select. The statement mentioned states that when people go by their heart more than their intellectual brain, and then just for the sake of justification, give random logic, their decisions tend to burn them. I partially agree with this, and my point of view is based on 2 instances.
Sometimes, it so happens, that we need to hear our inner voice and then decide. For example, when we have to select a career for ourselves, we need to understand what we really want rather than just looking at the big names that are the 'hot' jobs of that time. These trends fade now and then. Our decisions should be a combination of our emotions and our intellect. But on the other hand, if some decision has been made with emotion, later just for the sake of justification, you need not give an explanation. Sometimes students take up a certain subject choice based on peer pressure, then later justify it with pros of that subject. But what about your will and your interest? Emotional decisions make sense, but only when they are strengthened by a deep calculative thought.
To see another side of the coin, let's understand this with an alternate situation. If we consider a business where major decisions have to be taken quickly, that affects a lot not only the business but all the staff members associated with it, in this situation, any emotional thought should not deviate from your decision. It should be pragmatic calculations, logic, reasons, and a firm idea that should bolster your decision. For example. the co-founder of Infosys, Mr. Narayan Murthy took the decision to leave his job, just to work on his idea of bringing a technological revolution in India. This decision was not made in haste, he took about 3-4 months to calculate the pros and cons of the decision and how it would affect his life. When he was confident with his choice, only then he decided to take the step forward. Had he been emotional about the financial stability of his family or anything else, we wouldn't have Infosys today.
People might cross-question my opinion with shreds of evidence showing the contrasting consequences of decisions made emotionally, but, I can say that this depends majorly on the situation. Sometimes you have to think emotionally as well. This does not make you a poor decision-maker, but it will only add on to your belief in your choice. Thus when we dig deep in our hearts and paint our decisions with colors of emotion, sometimes it does end up ruining our lives, because there is no logic involved. We can say that such people are bad decision-makers.
An ideal way to make decisions should be to reconcile with our emotional and intellectual powers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | yixova3193 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-14 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- Task 1 The diagram below shows the production of steam using a gas cooled nuclear reactor Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 50
- Task 1 The charts give information about two genres of TV programs watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...uld bolster your decision. For example. the co-founder of Infosys, Mr. Narayan Murt...
^^^
Line 3, column 914, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...lity of his family or anything else, we wouldnt have Infosys today. People might cros...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 341, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...y add on to your belief in your choice. Thus when we dig deep in our hearts and pain...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, really, so, then, thus, well, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 33.0505617978 215% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2388.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 504.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7380952381 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76025938491 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513888888889 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 740.7 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 6.24550561798 272% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6440877988 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.52 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.16 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335849321063 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925161414905 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059001194753 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203676548056 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459185140561 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...uld bolster your decision. For example. the co-founder of Infosys, Mr. Narayan Murt...
^^^
Line 3, column 914, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...lity of his family or anything else, we wouldnt have Infosys today. People might cros...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 341, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...y add on to your belief in your choice. Thus when we dig deep in our hearts and pain...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, really, so, then, thus, well, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 71.0 33.0505617978 215% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2388.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 504.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7380952381 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76025938491 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513888888889 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 740.7 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 6.24550561798 272% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6440877988 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.52 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.16 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335849321063 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0925161414905 0.0831039109588 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059001194753 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203676548056 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459185140561 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.