The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In the fast pace of modern life nowadays, the use of social media platforms is increase, consequently replaces in-person interaction between people and people in society. While I accept that this trend has certain positive effects on individuals, I believe that there are more likely to have a harmful impact.
On the one hand, social media platforms can help people in various aspects of life. Although it may reduce the face-to-face comunication, perhaps it is one of the best ways helping people keep in touch with each other regardless of time zones, making it easier to maintain relationships. People who live far from home can update the life of their friends or family through pictures posted on some social platforms such as Facebook, Instagram,... In addition, social media also provides a platform for businesses to reach a wider audience and engage with customers directly. For instance, businesses can create an official page and share engaging and adorable contents that resonate with a wide audience. As a reasult, sales and economic growth can be boosted potentially.
However, the replacement of direct interaction due to the social media usage also brings several drawbacks to people. To commence with, individuals, especially the youth, may suffer from stress and depression because of the unrealistics comparisions and aspiration on the social media. As a result, it can put people in risks of some mental issues in long term, feelings of inadequacy and self-doubt for example. Moreover, the disappearance of face-to-face interaction can reduce the sense of community among people. People may immerse themselves in the vitual world and prioritize online connections over real-life relationships, leading to feelings of loneliness and detachment.
In conclusion, it seem to me that the potential dangers of the trend that in-person community being replaced by social media are more significant than the possible benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
- In most successful organisations some people believe that communication between managers and workers is important while other people said that other factors are more significant What is your opinion 61
- The diagrams show a museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 61
- More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999
- Fossil fuels such as coal oil and natural gas are the main energy source for many countries However some nations are using alternative energy such as solar power or wind power To what extent do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 442, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...al platforms such as Facebook, Instagram,... In addition, social media also provid...
^^
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...ess and detachment. In conclusion, it seem to me that the potential dangers of the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39802631579 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99505991863 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2266814514 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.214285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252789637391 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847928113457 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756182585625 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149757634952 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434120181331 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 442, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...al platforms such as Facebook, Instagram,... In addition, social media also provid...
^^
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'seems'?
Suggestion: seems
...ess and detachment. In conclusion, it seem to me that the potential dangers of the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39802631579 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99505991863 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2266814514 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.214285714 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252789637391 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847928113457 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756182585625 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149757634952 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434120181331 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.