The graph shows the number of students enrolled in two different schools. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line chart illustrates how many students registered at the two different schools throughout the years from 2011 to 2014.
It is clear that while there was an upward tendency in the number of applications in Riverside school, this number fell at Litchfield school.
As can be seen, there were around 950 students enrolled in Riverside School in the year 2011 and then there was a small increase to over 1,000 enrollments in 2012. Over the next two years, the sum of those soared considerably and reached a high of 1,500 applicants in 2014.
In contrast, 800 students studied in Litchfield school at the beginning of the observed time, then it rose very slightly to the peak at just over 800 pupils. Nevertheless, the total of those declined gradually and hit a low of 700 registers in the year 2014.
Overall, there was an increase in the number of students in Riverside School while this number decreased steadily in Litchfield School.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-10 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | view |
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- It is a natural process of animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos etc There is no reason why people should stop this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant
- The line graph shows the number of cell phone subscribers in a particular city by gender Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparison where relevant
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91304347826 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69161331229 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55900621118 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.6776005902 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182553484092 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886329291266 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557370383112 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114424489649 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403353004987 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.