The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant..
The given diagram and table illustrate the total number of using water in several sectors by globally and the people of Brazil Land Congo in 2000.
Overall, it can be deemed that the lines of agriculture, Industrial and domestic were used water by no more than 1,000 km² between 1900 and 1950 in over the world.
First of all, individuals consumed water for harvesting by no more than 1000 km²³ till 1950 which climbed up rapidly by almost 3,000 km²³ in 2000. Moreover, factories occupied water by 0 km² from 1900 to 1940 after that the line rose gradually by just over the 1,000 km² between 1950 and 2000. Therefore, the line of domestic use stayed with 0 km² until 1960 which increased slightly by just over the 0 km³ in the world.
However, 176 million Brazilians public consumed water for irrigation which was 25, 500 km² land when one person used 359 m³ in 2000. In addition, the population of Democratic Republic of Congo occupied water by 5.2 million while 100 km² land required water for harvesting and no more than 8 m² water consumed by one member in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-22 | nijam | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | maiphuonganh | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-30 | Johndavisvu | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | mina_sharifi | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-16 | mina_sharifi | 11 | view |
- oday the high sales of popular goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real need of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Water is a natural resource that should always be free Governments should ban the sale of bottled water To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that increasing tax on various industries will reduce pollution whereas others believe that there are better alternative ways Discuss both the view and give your opinion 89
- Mobile phones and the Internet have made it easy to stay in contact with other people However as a lot of time is spent using telephones and computers there is less face to face contact and direct communication Is the growing use of communications technol 61
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an ag 79
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71204188482 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34249754667 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 22.0352222682 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114385458352 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665997848983 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032206726511 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843302898695 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266067019793 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 900.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71204188482 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34249754667 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544502617801 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 22.0352222682 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 128.571428571 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2857142857 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 5.23603664747 199% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114385458352 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665997848983 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032206726511 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843302898695 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266067019793 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.