The charts show the proportion of male and female employees in different job categories in an engineering company in 2005 and in 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graphs demonstrate the percentage of male and female staff working in terms of five kinds of positions for an engineering company between 2005 and 2015.
In 2005, the proportion of men working as vice presidents was more than 2 times the figure for women, at 70% and 32%. However, the data for male employees was equal to that of female staff, at 50% each in 2015. Similarly, standing at 58%, the percentage of male staff as managers was slightly higher than the figure for female staff, at 48% in the first year of the period, before the data for male and female employees was both 50% in the final year.
In 2005, the percentage of male staff as directors was 60% before a considerable decrease to 40% was exhibited in 2015, as opposed to a remarkable increase of 20% to 60% was seen in the figure for female staff in the same year. Meanwhile, the proportion of men remained stable at 70% from 2005 to 2015, there was a slow growth of 2% to 32% in the figure for women in the same period. In terms of administrators, the percentage of male employees was much higher than the data for female employees throughout the period, even though the figure for female employees saw a modest rise of 10% to 20% in 2015, while a moderate dip of 10% to 80% was experienced in the data for male staff in the same year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | dung16022002 | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-14 | Titi2lope | 78 | view |
- The charts show the proportion of male and female employees in different job categories in an engineering company in 2005 and in 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts show the proportion of male and female employees in different job categories in an engineering company in 2005 and in 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
- People should choose their course of study not on the basis of their own interests but based on the kinds of jobs they can get To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The internet has vastly increased our access to information To what extent do you think this is a good thing Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 73
- In the past most people spend their entire career working for one company whereas people nowadays move from one job to another What are the advantages and disadvantages of each Which do you think is better 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% was exhibited in 2015, as opposed to a remarkable increase of 20% to 60% was se...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.40329218107 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50730444021 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.411522633745 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.4853257493 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.857142857 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.7142857143 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159843028355 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105709000318 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473495354317 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14799890971 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406220404735 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.35 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.