People should choose their course of study not on the basis of their own interests, but based on the kinds of jobs they can get.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There are two perspectives that choosing the course of study for students is based on the basis of their interests or the kinds of job they can get. While the thinking that depending on occupations they can apply is valid to a certain extent, it is my belief that relying on the interests is more suitable.
There is a reason people should choose the course of study on the kinds of job they can get. In fact, students tend to choose majors that can help them obtain a high-paying job in the future. This is because, they do not have an obvious orientation to choose a career path, and also mainly follow the consultation of other people such as parents or teachers. For example, nowadays with the advancement of technology, many students are enrolling in information technology courses at universities, while they do not know whether they are good at coding and computing or not. In addition to this, this major is quite difficult to learn and digest. Even though people will be paid a high salary when becoming a programmer, it requires them to have high levels of expertise and to handle a heavy workload while working.
Despite the about argument, I firmly believe that people should choose their career path on the basis of their own interest. It must be recognized that people's passions play a crucial role in what they choose. Spending everyone's whole life on a favorite job can help boost their motivation and inspiration, even though they only receive meager income. However, if they know how to utilize their passion and strive to pursue their career in what they choose, nothing will be impossible. Moreover, it is easier to orient occupations in the future when you are interested in a certain field. For example, if you are good at art and designing, becoming a designer or an architect is the most suitable to make the most of your drawing ability.
In conclusion, while it is true to some extent that people should their course of study that is based on the kinds of job they can get, I would maintain that it is more suitable when choosing on the basis of their interests.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | dung16022002 | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | Blackcytrus | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-04 | Jiny Ju | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | SaranyaJeevesh | 81 | view |
- People should choose their course of study not on the basis of their own interests but based on the kinds of jobs they can get To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The charts show the proportion of male and female employees in different job categories in an engineering company in 2005 and in 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Internet social media have become very popular To what extent do you think this is a good or bad thing Why do you think this is the case Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- In the past most people spend their entire career working for one company whereas people nowadays move from one job to another What are the advantages and disadvantages of each Which do you think is better 67
- The charts show the proportion of male and female employees in different job categories in an engineering company in 2005 and in 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 64
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 739, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... make the most of your drawing ability. In conclusion, while it is true to some ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6847826087 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57367227686 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489130434783 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2010287943 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.933333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.523148225183 0.244688304435 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178155031031 0.084324248473 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153831842801 0.0667982634062 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351803346692 0.151304729494 233% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763368041881 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 739, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... make the most of your drawing ability. In conclusion, while it is true to some ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6847826087 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57367227686 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489130434783 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2010287943 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.933333333 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5333333333 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.523148225183 0.244688304435 214% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178155031031 0.084324248473 211% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153831842801 0.0667982634062 230% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351803346692 0.151304729494 233% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763368041881 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.