The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The illustration gives information about the average monthly variations of three materials which are copper, nickel, and zinc every month throughout the year 2014.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were considerable downward trends in the selling price of copper, nickel, and zinc in the first half of the year. Their prices remained static from July to September after increasing sharply towards the end of the period. Another interesting point is that Nikel started with the highest percentage change of the three but ended up in the lowest position, whereas the opposite side was true in the case of Zinc.
Look at the details, as regards Nikel, its payment rate started at 6 percent in January of 2014, and then the price hit the bottom at just -3 percent after 6 months. Having stayed unchanged at -1 percent over a three-month period from July to September, the figure then continued decreasing to -2 percent in the next month prior to ending at 3% in December.
Commencing at the second highest (at 2%), copper saw its most dramatic fall during the first half of 2014, reaching its trough of -0.5% in June. Maintaining constant at -1 percent in the next three months, the rate then grew slightly to around 1 percent from November onwards, which is about three times higher than the figure in October.
As for the last metal, Zinc’s price reached its peak at 3 percent in just the first two months of the year, followed by a remarkable fall to -1 percent in June. The figure rose considerably to finish at 2 percent after leveling off at nearly 0 percent from July to September.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-22 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 73 | view |
| 2024-02-29 | MinyiChu | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-25 | Ahmad_off | 73 | view |
- The maps detail the changes to the layout of a public library between 20 years ago and present day 84
- In the modern world people no longer need to use food or products from animals such as medicine and clothing Do you agree or disagree with that statement 78
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- In many countries around the world rural people are moving to cities so the population in the countryside is decreasing Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 61
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c every month throughout the year 2014. Overall, what stands out from the graph ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at -1 percent in the next three months, the rate then grew slightly to around 1 ...
^^
Line 8, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in October. As for the last metal, Zinc’s price reached its peak at 3 perce...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, second, then, whereas, as for, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 280.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77857142857 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47579094762 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 106.607317073 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.7026131215 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.8 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125369666773 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589089129717 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435940739245 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861266296292 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459587356731 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c every month throughout the year 2014. Overall, what stands out from the graph ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... at -1 percent in the next three months, the rate then grew slightly to around 1 ...
^^
Line 8, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in October. As for the last metal, Zinc’s price reached its peak at 3 perce...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, second, then, whereas, as for, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 33.7804878049 181% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 280.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77857142857 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47579094762 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 106.607317073 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 283.868780488 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.7026131215 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.8 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 5.23603664747 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125369666773 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589089129717 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435940739245 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861266296292 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459587356731 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.