These days many of us prefer to throw damaged thing away whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time Explain why you think this change has happened What are the effects of this change in attitude

Essay topics:

These days many of us prefer to throw damaged thing away, whereas in the past people used to repair damaged items and keep them for a long time. Explain why you think this change has happened? What are the effects of this change in attitude?

In today's modern world, people are being increasingly accessible to all sorts of product at an affordable price. Therefore, there is a group of people who discard used or damaged things while in the past, people fix their belongings and continue using them. In this essay, I will discuss about the reason behind this phenomenon as well as the impacts of it.

To begin with, individuals throwing damaged things away is due to several factors. Initially, goods are now more easy to be accessed to by consumers. The technology has largely contributed to this trend with the introduction of online shopping. For instance, consumers from all over the world can buy almost everything with just a mobile phone, specifically via applications namely Shopee or Tiki. Furthermore, the living standard of customers has improved. In other words, people now earn more money and as a result of this, they spend more money on shopping.

Due to the causes I have mentioned, several effects and problems have arisen. First and foremost, most people would no longer value their possessions. In the past, people tried their best to mend broken things because they may not have the right conditions to buy alternative items and they are also dear to their heart. These days, the tremendous improvement in living standard has changed the consumer psyche and it is making people think that they should not waste time mending things as they can just buy a new one to replace instead. In addition, this phenomenon is also the leading cause of the problem of resources shortage. Particularly, people easily throwing things away would result in more materials being depleted to the environment. It may not only negatively alter the environment but certain rare materials are also being wasted.

To conclude, there is a striking difference between how people treat damaged possessions these days and in the past. Several detrimental effects are witnessed. Hence, there should be a campaign to help raise everyone's awareness about the mentioned phenomenon of material wasting.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-10-11 zanzendegi 73 view
2023-10-03 HeyGungOri 56 view
2023-10-03 HeyGungOri 84 view
2021-08-11 gur1040894 61 view
2021-07-16 mrn 67 view
Essays by user HeyGungOri :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In todays modern world, people are being...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omenon as well as the impacts of it. To begin with, individuals throwing dama...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., they spend more money on shopping. Due to the causes I have mentioned, seve...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are materials are also being wasted. To conclude, there is a striking differe...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14029850746 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71828703941 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588059701493 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4958874147 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6315789474 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6315789474 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21052631579 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242828758897 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637204062676 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058684720174 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140178637733 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318610785232 0.056905535591 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In todays modern world, people are being...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...omenon as well as the impacts of it. To begin with, individuals throwing dama...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., they spend more money on shopping. Due to the causes I have mentioned, seve...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are materials are also being wasted. To conclude, there is a striking differe...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14029850746 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71828703941 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588059701493 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.4958874147 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6315789474 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6315789474 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21052631579 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242828758897 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637204062676 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058684720174 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140178637733 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318610785232 0.056905535591 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.