The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007, 2011 and 2015. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The bar chart provides information on annual household income in millions. Comparative US household wage data presented for 2007, 2011 and 2015.
Overall, in the years mentioned above, more households were paid more, with the exception of 2011, which saw more households earning between $25,000 and $49,000. It is clear that few households are paid salaries ranging from $75,000 to $99,999.
At the beginning of this period, the majority of household incomes were above $100,000, or nearly 30 million households. However, this number continued to increase to about 33 million households with the same income level in 2015. However, there was still a slight decrease in 2011 when about 5 million households lacked housing. Furthermore, families with median incomes between $50,000 and $75,000 ranged from $13 million to $15 million during this period.
American households with incomes under $50,000 are fluctuating. In 2007, the number of these families was about 25-27 million but in the next 4 years this number increased to nearly 30 million households and by 2015, the number of families decreased to an average of 27 million households.
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you thing this is a positive or a negative development 78
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevan 84
- The chart below gives information about how families in 1 country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you thing this is a positive or a negative development 56
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 72, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
... above, more households were paid more, with the exception of 2011, which saw more households earning...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23756906077 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63736791758 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580110497238 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.0498671624 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183830354391 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095585063944 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598360917065 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142958210479 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0846933538237 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.