The charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015

Essay topics:

The charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015

The pie graphes illustrate information the distinction of learning English of the residents in three countries in two examine years. Overall, it is clear that the percentage of evening class outweighted two remain categories while learning online had the smallest figure except for Country C.
Regarding to Country A, the percent of evening class slightly decreased at 70% in 2010 and 67% in 2015, this trend can be also seen in abroad, with 25% in 2010 and 23% in the next five years. Online learning seen a twofold increase at 5% and 10%, respectively.
Concerning to Country B, online learning increased dramatically from 8% to 32%, respectively while abroad remaind the same figure in two years, 20%. Evening class dropt aproximately two times lower than its in 2010, at 72% and 48% respectively.
In terms of Country C, the percentage of evening class had a tiny reduce at around 10% but this figure also outweighted remain categories. Online witnessed aproximately two time higher than its in 2010, with 6% and 15%, respectively. In 2015, 3% of population went aboard for studying English.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-06 phamkhuyen 78 view
2022-02-27 Nguyen Khanh 61 view
2021-11-24 my220904 73 view
2021-11-12 khali view
2021-06-07 khuekhue 73 view
Essays by user phamkhuyen :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, regarding, so, while, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04945054945 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88134822828 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587912087912 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5508018671 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180016416735 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831373527543 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396243087702 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121601773233 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223351562334 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.