In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Agriculture is one of the aspects which growing technology helps to adverse to loss crop yields and more product. Nevertheless, there are lots of people who don’t have enough food to eat around the world and are still hungry. In my view, there are many ways that can contribute to solve this problem.
One possible approach is all nations should use advance agricultural instruments to irrigation, schedule harvesting, planning plant, and management the operators. Although such technologies are monopoly some countries this should be a role which other countries have them too. Some cultures are still use old-fashion methods and farmer machine to harvesting crops because either they are boycott from other nations and cannot provide these tools or the tool’s price is very high that cannot buy them. It is very essential that all governments help each other to tackle with poverty.
Other more effective approach is some countries either because of lack of seeds or lack of fertile soil don’t have any food resource. By growing the population and increasing demand for food nutrients it becomes a very serious problems especially in poor food countries. Hence, countries such USA and Netherland which have more seeds and store them would be give other nations that are poor. If they do this the problem of hungry will solve to extend.
Finally, even though the resources is different in any country for example one country has good mines, another has very useful soil and etc. some countries don’t have suitable soil and seeds to have good harvests. Whereas this problem can be solved by above approaches but it is very difficult for governments which accept it because some countries are enemy with each other.
In conclusion, although technology can help farmers to provide more crops in most countries in part of world because shortage of enough food people die. This becomes a global challenge and to solve it some ways mentioned above.
- Some people believe that it is beast to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these view and give your own opinion 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ng plant, and management the operators. Although such technologies are monopoly some cou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 301, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'used'.
Suggestion: used
... have them too. Some cultures are still use old-fashion methods and farmer machine ...
^^^
Line 2, column 583, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...help each other to tackle with poverty. Other more effective approach is some co...
^^^
Line 3, column 228, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'problem'?
Suggestion: problem
...ood nutrients it becomes a very serious problems especially in poor food countries. Henc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ld be give other nations that are poor. If they do this the problem of hungry will...
^^
Line 4, column 133, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...ood mines, another has very useful soil and etc. some countries don’t have suitable soil...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, hence, if, nevertheless, so, still, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09968847352 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53971090895 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526479750779 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9098735383 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.3125 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164889443645 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655014866961 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653535722766 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110308234652 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578456544177 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.