It is a natural process of animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should stop this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?"
People have different views about whether or not the extinction of animal species is a natural phenomenon, and preventing this process is pointless. From my perspective, I am completely against this notion for several reasons.
First of all, humans are partly responsible for various disappearances of animal species. While many wild beasts went extinct from natural causes, a greater proportion of species are on the verge of extinction or no longer extant due to human activities. Mass deforestation to build infrastructure or for timber harvesting has cost wild animals their living habitats, leading to food source depletion and eventually, death. To illustrate, Australia's recent wildfires have pushed around 100 species closer to extinction. Hunting is another notorious cause for the dwindling of animals’ population as many species such as rhinos or elephants are hunted for their body parts. For example, the African Black Rhinos are no longer in existence for being hunted for their horns.
Another point is that preventing animals from becoming extinct is critical to our ecosystem. The loss of animal species could disrupt our ecosystem’s balance. Since all living organisms’ lives in a habitat are interrelated, once a species succumb to extinction, other animals that depend on it will be affected and eventually disappear. This will lead to a lack of diversity and can also cause potential damage to our economy. For example, in 2013, the sunflower starfish in Northern California declined in number due to disease, thus causing its prey - the purple sea urchins to flourish. This sudden proliferation has damaged the red urchins’ population and also exhausted a great source of sushi, which resulted in a slump in the area’s economy.
To summarize, the process of animal extinction has been escalated by human activities such as hunting and deforestation. This will have grave consequences on both our ecosystem and our economy, thus we must take action to protect all animal species.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 89 | view |
- The best way for a country to prepare for the future is to invest more resources in the young people Do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries people are having children at a later age in life What are the reasons Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- Space exploration is a controversial topic Some people believe that resources should be invested in exploring space while others argue that this money could be better spent on more pressing problems on Earth such as poverty and climate change Discuss both 84
- More people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 35, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
People have different views about whether or not the extinction of animal species is a n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, thus, while, for example, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37025316456 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96911292504 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598101265823 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5735560207 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0625 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 7.06120827912 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199075883927 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719229183038 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631576513135 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137724149628 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509534408022 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.