People are living in a ‘throwaway society,’ using things for a short time and then throwing them away. What are the causes of this? What problems does it lead to?
Nowadays, more and more people use items for short periods and after that, they throw the things away. This essay will address the factors contributing to this phenomenon and propose viable solutions to deal with this matter.
Many people are unaware of the consequences of dumping a way their items as they never receive proper information about this issue. To deal with this problem, the governmental body should act quickly to increase people's awareness about the negative effects of throwing away things. Placing a board containing messages related to the downside effects of consumerism, in various places, such as shopping centers or markets, for instance, is an effective solution. This way, whenever people want to buy new things, they have to reconsider it, and eventually, there will be no additional pieces of stuff to be dumped.
Another possible variable is the economic factor. Stuff, such as clothes are much more affordable in this era in comparison to decades ago. With a limited amount of money, people are able to buy several sets of new clothes, leading to a consumerism lifestyle. To solve this issue, the government has to impose high taxes on consumer goods, such as clothes. Thus, the number of goods that can be purchased is limited and fewer things will end up as waste.
To sum up, factors such as unawareness about its negative consequences and the decreasing economic value of consumer goods are the two most important variables contributing to the phenomenon. Therefore, to tackle this problem approaches such as educating people and imposing higher taxes are possible solutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-31 | Wardiati Yusuf | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-31 | Wardiati Yusuf | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-31 | Wardiati Yusuf | 84 | view |
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe that money should be spend on improving existing public transport Discuss both the 61
- Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession Is this a positive or negative development 73
- The given pie charts shows the proportion of British students able yo use languages other than english Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The chart shows the percentage of women and men in one Asian country who passed when they took their driving test between 1980 and 2010 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15648854962 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71996044782 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 106.607317073 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610687022901 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9959217327 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.923076923 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183460003763 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642971638137 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598934774114 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117641144709 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620557941509 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, thus, as to, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15648854962 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71996044782 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 106.607317073 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610687022901 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9959217327 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.923076923 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183460003763 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642971638137 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598934774114 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117641144709 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620557941509 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 40.7170731707 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.