Some people think the government funding should be used for supporting art and cultures, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Some people believe that the funding from the government should not be spent on culture and art. However, others support that funding for cultural activities can benefit individuals and the culture. In my opinion, funding for these factors is more advantageous and this essay will discuss both views and explain the reasons.
On the one hand, there are some reasons why people may think that art and culture are not worth being funded. The first one can depends on the assumption that funding for these aspects is expensive because
some cultural-related forms such as traditional sculptures require a significant amount of money for preservation. Another explanation for the disapproval is that some individuals consider art or cultural activities unnecessary to invest money in since their impact is thought to be superior to that of health and education.
On the other hand, cultural activities can have many benefits to the culture and people of the society, which I trust to be more impactful than the drawbacks. Art and culture are closely related to a country's origin and history, thereby investing money to promote these can help educate citizens about national identity. Moreover, cultures and artistic masterpieces can differentiate a country's identity from others. Tuong, for instance, is a traditional music genre in Vietnam that is famous for its unique ways of performing compared to other genres. Therefore, funding for promotion and preservation of these aspects is beneficial to some extent.
In conclusion, although some people perceive that it can be excessive and expensive for the government to invest in art and culture. However, I believe that, with an appropriate amount of money spent on these factors, the national identity of citizens and the identification of a country can be made more prominent.
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane 73
- The pie charts compare ways of accessing the news in Canada and Australia in 2018 84
- Being a celebrity such as famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefits Do you think the advantages of being a celebrity outweigh its disadvantages 78
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- As machines have become more sophisticated more and more jobs and tasks involving physical hard work can be done automatically Do the positive effects of this trend outweigh the negative effects 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'depend'
Suggestion: depend
...t worth being funded. The first one can depends on the assumption that funding for thes...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...izens about national identity. Moreover, cultures and artistic masterpieces can d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31615120275 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91821581015 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518900343643 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1236255272 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465473048562 0.244688304435 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18074907149 0.084324248473 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956272037922 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276780639054 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106737453947 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'depend'
Suggestion: depend
...t worth being funded. The first one can depends on the assumption that funding for thes...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...izens about national identity. Moreover, cultures and artistic masterpieces can d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31615120275 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91821581015 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518900343643 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1236255272 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465473048562 0.244688304435 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18074907149 0.084324248473 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956272037922 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276780639054 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106737453947 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.