The table shows data about underground railway systems in six major cities with date opened kilometres of route and passenger numbers per year in millions Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features making comparisons where rele

Essay topics:

The table shows data about underground railway systems in six major cities with date opened, kilometres of route and passenger numbers per year in millions.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

The table shows information on opening dates, route kilometres and yearly passengers in millions of the underground railway systems in six cities.
Overall, railway systems in London, Paris and Tokyo have higher route kilometres and more passengers per year than those of the other cities. London’s system was opened the earliest and has the longest route, whereas Los Angeles’s railway system has the latest opening date. Moreover, in terms of route length and yearly passengers, Kyoto ranks last.
London’s system was first opened in 1863, more than a century earlier than that of Los Angeles (2001). It also has the highest route kilometres (394), nearly double that of the second largest subway in Paris (199). The yearly passengers of London’s system only rank third with 775 millions, less than the most used system in Tokyo (1928 millions) by over half.
Among the three modern railway systems, Kyoto’s subway, which was opened in 1981, has the shortest kilometres of route (11), less than that of the second shortest Los Angeles by a gap of 17. It also has the least passengers per year, with only 45 million, less than that of Washington DC with 144.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-07 reverjae 73 view
2024-01-07 reverjae 73 view
2024-01-07 reverjae 73 view
Essays by user reverjae :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, moreover, second, so, third, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00515463918 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38416968049 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525773195876 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7948671997 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.888888889 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307673338749 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149310866112 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120142995508 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246381662719 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129214919245 0.0819641961636 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.