Nowadays, celebrities earn more money than politicians. What are the reasons for this? Is it a positive or negative development?
Recently, personages have a tendency to earn a greater amount of income than their counterparts in politics. I am convinced that this development is beneficial and can be explained by some compelling rationales.
The number of income sources lies at the root of this contrast. As for prominences in the entertainment business, their income can be generated through diverse channels. Apart from the salary obtained from their performances, celebrities can also earn a fortune through lucrative contracts from celebrity endorsements or public events The increasing ubiquity of social media platforms also plays an important role here, in which the better they make a name for themselves, the higher chance they can improve incomes. On the other hand, politicians can only be offered a much lower fixed salary deducted from governmental budgets and taxes. Moreover, they are not entitled to run their own business, as an act to ensure the integrity of the market. As a result, the disparity in earnings of these two professions will invariably be maintained in contemporary society.
Objectively, this discrepancy can be deemed advantageous considering several factors. Given the nature of their work, politicians are required to be completely upright and not influenced by financial motivation. Therefore, issuing a fixed and sufficient level of salary could encourage them to work with an unwavering commitment to society and avoid bribery or corruption. Meanwhile, a comparative income of public figures could reflect the cultural and economic values they contributed to their nation. Through artistic performances and work, their country’s image can be promoted and recognized worldwide, thereby generating substantial foreign investments. For instance, for the past decades, the Hallyu Wave of Korean artists has exported their pop and entertainment cultures throughout Asia, which massively benefit both the popularity and economy of this East Asian nation.
In conclusion, the income of these two professions relies heavily on the variety in their income sources. This trend should be highly encouraged as it promotes politicians’ integrity in national governing, as well as celebrities’s duty in cultural integration and economic contribution.
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate towards buying their products What problems does this cause What could be done to encourage people to buy local products 78
- More people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes Do you think it is a positive or negative developments 84
- Obesity is an increasing public health problem in some parts of the world Explain some possible reasons for this problem and suggest some solutions 89
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your 84
- Some people think personal happiness is closely related to economic success while others believe that it depends on other factors Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... celebrity endorsements or public events The increasing ubiquity of social media ...
^^
Line 5, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nced by financial motivation. Therefore, issuing a fixed and sufficient level of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, apart from, as for, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68436578171 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18727707159 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613569321534 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 610.2 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1199614174 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.4375 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131245798931 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428289231433 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346512842353 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903945844505 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242631870642 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.