Many parents these days work in other countries, taking their families with them. Do you think the advantages of the development outweigh its disadvantages?
Nowadays, with the development of global economy, more and more people work oversea. It is prevalent for parents to take family members to work abroad. From my perspective, my view is that taking families to work abroad can bring about more disadvantages compared to any benefits that it might bring.
It is obvious that taking families to work abroad has advantages. It can allow parents to have ample time to bond with family members and friends, which can help them cultivate bonded and close relationships and make them feel connected. This is the significant resources of psychological satisfaction. However, telecommunication tools enable us to keep in contact with others whenever we want, which will not affect the quality of relationships with families. Moreover, parents works abroad means that they can enjoy more romantic time with each other, which can improve their goodwill as between spouses.
There are several deficiencies which I believe that parents take their family member work abroad can appear. Firstly, it is extremely expensive to take families to work abroad. This is because people need to spend more money on their family members such as old people and children, which imposes financial burden on the whole family. For example, parents need to rent a bigger place, buy more daily products and foods, which would increase financial stress. Moreover, if parents bring families work outside might decrease their work productivity. Parents would be distracted by family responsibilities, for example, cooking at a regular time, picking up children, looking after other family members, which would create stress and anxiety, thereby reducing working efficiency.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that holding up the working efficiency and increasing cost of living far outweigh any of the minor benefits that could result from parents taking families member work abroad.
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both these views and give your 61
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- Some people think it is acceptable to use animals for the benefit of humans Other people think it is wrong to exploit animals for human purpose Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Some university students want to learn about other subjects in addition to their main subjects Others believe it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for a qualification Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'families'' or 'family's'?
Suggestion: families'; family's
...s that could result from parents taking families member work abroad.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40740740741 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76278578545 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56228956229 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4515521848 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.066666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287723617232 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118534782642 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573095794694 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188344674046 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197170377425 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.