The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and the plans for its development.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams demonstrate the degree to which Islip town centre has changed from now to the near future.
Overall, in the future, the construction of the centre will be expanded significantly for more useful infrastructures, such as a bus station, a car park, and a pedestrian road. Additionally, the centre will be surrounded by a dual carriageway, instead of an open region as in the present.
Currently, there are two shops divided by a main road, and a region for housing in front of these shops; however, in the future, it is proposed that the shop lying at the top of the map will be replaced by some facilities, including a bus station, a shopping centre, a car park, and an area for housing. On the right to the bottom of the diagram, there is a park located next to the housing on the main road, but it is going to narrow down in size to establish another housing in the area. Moreover, the main road that crosses over the two shops will be utilized for pedestrians only in the proposed plan.
In addition, at the bottom to the left of the region, the school will be still maintained, but it is going to be expanded to admit more students, and the housing which is in close proximity to the school will be relocated to the right side, opposite the new housing opened next to the park. Finally, it is not hard to define that the countryside will be diminished in size, making way for the extension of the centre and the emergence of the dual carriageway.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-25 | minhnhat2002 | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | Klinh2504 | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | Klinh2504 | 60 | view |
| 2023-10-29 | Klinh2504 | 60 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | sangeeth28 | 73 | view |
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish Discuss both these views and give your 73
- The table below shows population figures for four countries for 2003 and the projected figure for 2025 and 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The line graph and table show the average monthly temperatures and annual hours of sunshine in three major cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some students choose to work or travel after leaving school and before going to university Many people however say that working experience is more useful in adult life than travel Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer a 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: down
...he main road, but it is going to narrow down in size to establish another housing in the are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 175, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...e students, and the housing which is in close proximity to the school will be relocated to the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, so, still, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48689138577 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70691442637 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483146067416 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.7271226916 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.75 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.375 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108609557707 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061212630215 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412675822981 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079963858315 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381689900943 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: down
...he main road, but it is going to narrow down in size to establish another housing in the are...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 175, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...e students, and the housing which is in close proximity to the school will be relocated to the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, so, still, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1198.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 267.0 196.424390244 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48689138577 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70691442637 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483146067416 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.7271226916 43.030603864 169% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.75 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.375 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108609557707 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061212630215 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412675822981 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079963858315 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381689900943 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.