Whether or not someone achieves their aims is mostly by a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The idea that people attain their goals mainly depending on luck is controversial. In my opinion, I totally disagree with this point. Reaching the goals depends on many factors, not only on good fortune.
On the one hand, the success levels are according to the goal commitment and studiousness of people. In any life’s aspects, achieving gold processes is always difficult with many obstacles. As a result, success is the final present for people with high consistency with their aims. For example, Nick Vujicic, a famous inspirer with a rare disease that resulted in an absence of four limbs. However, with his optimistic mind, he overcame his difficulties and graduated college with flying colors. At present, he has his own family with two normal children and travels around the world to motivate people through his stories, he also publishes books about his life.
On the other hand, luck is important but not the crucial factor, people who are over-reliant on luck rarely make their dream come true. It is true that before any examination, students with not carefully prepared usually fail the exam. Furthermore, the person who wins the lottery once in their life thanks to their fortune without any effort will always look to win again. As a result, they would not have the desire to commit to the office and all the money they earn would become an expenditure for lottery tickets.
In conclusion, the top priority needs for achieving goals is industriousness and persistence in people, not by their luck.
- The diagram shows the components of a neuron and how it works 11
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment Why is this the case and what solutions are possible 84
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before 89
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 84
- It is more important for school children to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 73, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...tant but not the crucial factor, people who are over-reliant on luck rarely make their ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, for example, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1273.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03162055336 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63891349926 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632411067194 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3055864723 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9285714286 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0966158841342 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377945471667 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445696714094 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0789468540281 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391287289724 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.