It is observed that in many countries, not enough students are choosing to study science as a subject.
What are the causes? And what will be the effects on society?
Some countries have reported that several students decide not to have science as their subject in their academic schedules. The result may come from the nature of the subject which seems to be boring for a student and consequently, it may lead to limitations in practical scientific research.
Primarily, science is too boring for students to learn. The nature of this subject, initially, may be a little bit dry and is not attractive enough for those students. This is because the entire process of science is to discover and explore things that are difficult to understand for a student who is not interested in the field. Additionally, as a young person, student will see that science, in comparison with other subjects, is not exciting and they prefer to pursue their dreams and favorite courses than to absorb knowledge that is not useful for them as they perceive. This can be seen through a case of a Vietnamese student. Toc Tien, instead of accepting invitation of a notion university which is known for its ability in executing research in Vietnam, determined pursuing her dream to be a singer. As a result, she is now one of the most famous singers in Vietnam and is ambassadors of several local brands as well.
However, this problem may cause some negative effects on economic growth of a nation. Science, which sounds boring, is not only about searching for scientific programs, such as biodiversity or astronomy, but also about seeking solutions for the development of economy, human health, etcetera. This, as a result, comes to decrease in the development of a nation. Furthermore, shortening in workforce can lead to the interruption in the advancement of this field, since the old generation cannot pass their knowledge and findings to the next generations. Simultaneously, the young people will not have the ability to heritage and continually enhance the academic assets from their parents.
In conclusion, the decrease in the number of students who choose science as their course in the academic year will have numerous bad consequences, especially decline in economic growth. However, this trend may have its own reasons, including the dry nature of the course. Therefore, schools and the government should strategically plan the schedule for the subject which can actually catch attention of the students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-10 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 78
- The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales in various formats of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the Internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion 73
- The chart below shows the number of households in the US by their annual income in 2007 2011 and 2015 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 104, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...re of this subject, initially, may be a little bit dry and is not attractive enough for th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 381.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12073490814 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89890943606 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530183727034 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8671954021 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.764705882 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4117647059 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158798361159 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534973000996 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445300428145 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102703226606 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409068853501 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.