Some people think that children should learn how to compete, but others think that children should be taught to cooperate to become more useful adults. Express some reasons for both views and give your own opinion.
Childhood is the most crucial phase in an individuals life. It helps in shaping an individuals mindset. The given topic asserts that, should children be directed towards being competitive or cooperative in life? I will examine both the dimensions of this topic through examples and assertions and shape up my opinion by the end.
On one hand, there are people who believe that children should have competitive mindset in order to become a successful human being. As we know with the rise in modernization, it has become very important that a person should be skilled in a particular field to get high pay packages. Therefore, children should be competitive to get selected in particular skillset to become successful in their life.
On the contrary, there are people who believes that children should learn to be cooperative. One of the reasons to support this statement is that, being cooperative in life will help children to learn that how they can resolve problems without hurting others emotions. For instance, a recent survey conducted by “ hind” in India stated that there were 30% reduction in fight in classrooms with the adoption of cooperative behaviour.
Nevertheless, weighing both the sides of the opinions, i believe there is no single conclusion. Still, I take the ground that an effective clap requires the use of both the hands. Therefore, i think there should be a balance between both. A child can only become sensible and successful, if he/she knows that the situation requires them to be competitive or cooperative. Hence, children should learn both competitive and cooperative skills.
- The given diagram shows the process of making water clock. 73
- These days it is much easier for many people to travel to different countries for tourism than in the past Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The three pie chart below show the changes in annual spending by particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007. 61
- Visual pollution is the major cause of accident on roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ildhood is the most crucial phase in an individuals life. It helps in shaping an individual...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ndividuals life. It helps in shaping an individuals mindset. The given topic asserts that, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...ing competitive or cooperative in life? I will examine both the dimensions of thi...
^
Line 7, column 56, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: i is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...eighing both the sides of the opinions, i believe there is no single conclusion. ...
^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...e there is no single conclusion. Still, I take the ground that an effective clap ...
^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: i is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...s the use of both the hands. Therefore, i think there should be a balance between...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, for instance, i think, in particular, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.48453608247 200% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 4.92783505155 223% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.03092783505 363% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 32.9175257732 73% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.85567010309 182% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 937.175257732 145% => OK
No of words: 263.0 206.0 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16349809886 4.54256449028 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.78020617076 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89705895681 2.54303337028 114% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 127.690721649 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562737642586 0.622605031667 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 290.88556701 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.13402061856 66% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6804123711 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9058121908 44.8134815571 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5333333333 76.5299724578 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 16.8248392259 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 4.34317383033 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 2.54639175258 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331209665561 0.216113520407 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114605983556 0.0766984524023 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894633217414 0.0603063233224 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194933312163 0.12726935374 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483052751422 0.0580467560999 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 8.37731958763 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 70.7449484536 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 8.71597938144 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 7.59969072165 104% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 41.2886597938 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.