The graph below shows the percentages of tourists who used different types of transport to travel within a particular nation between 1989 and 2009. Each tourist may have used more than one type of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph delineates the percentage of tourists who travelled by five different means of transportation, including car, rail, air, coach and ferry, between 1989 and 2009. While the choice of commute shifted during the period of two decades, the car was still one of the most favourable options for transportation.
In terms of the upward trend, only the two figures for coach and rail rocketed. From under 10% and 35% in 1989, the proportion of tourists who utilized coach and rail tripled to 27% and 59% in 2009, which marked the two figures at the first and the third place, respectively.
In contrast, there was a downward trend in the selection of car, air and ferry. In 1989, the figure of car and air stood at first and the second place with 49% and 39% respectively. While the percentage of travellers who commuted by car reached a peak in 1999 with 61%, that of car witnessed a dramatic drop of 10%. In the next decade, the two figures continued to decline by around 10% each. Quite similar to the pattern of the figure of car, that of ferry was the lowest number in the five figures, with only 1% in 1989, then rose quickly to 11% in the following 16 years before decreasing 1% in 2009.
In general, the selection of commute differs throughout 20 years. However, the car still took the lead most of the time, whereas the ferry was the least favourable option for travelling.
- The graph below shows the percentages of tourists who used different types of transport to travel within a particular nation between 1989 and 2009 Each tourist may have used more than one type of transport Summarise the information by selecting and report 73
- Many parents complain that computers games have no value to their children's studies. On the contrary, those online games have produced a lot of negative effects on their mental and physical development. What is your opinion? 78
- Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree
- The graphs below show information about citizenship in the UK 62
- The three pie charts below show the change in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, still, then, third, whereas, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1146.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62096774194 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56216924466 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524193548387 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4411545542 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.181818182 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126929513356 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524326351719 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601036009668 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829167319572 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476217110848 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.