The unlimited use of cars may have many problems. What are those problems ? In order to reduce the problems should we discourage people to use cars.
n contemporary society, the affordability and prevalence of cars have led to a variety of significant issues. While cars offer convenience and personal mobility, their excessive use contributes to problems such as traffic congestion and environmental degradation.
First and foremost, the rise in private automobile ownership has exacerbated traffic congestion in urban areas. For instance, traffic jams are a persistent problem in cities like Hanoi, Vietnam, and Paris, France. In Hanoi, congestion worsens during heavy rain, causing vehicles to be stuck on flooded roads. Similarly, Paris struggles with severe traffic gridlock due to high car usage. Such persistent traffic issues not only inconvenience drivers but also contribute to increased stress and reduced productivity.
Moreover, the environmental impact of gasoline-powered cars is another major concern. Emissions from car engines contribute significantly to air pollution and global warming. According to a report by the New York Times, the air quality index in the USA worsened dramatically in 2019, largely attributed to the high number of vehicles on the road. These emissions not only harm human health but also contribute to climate change, affecting ecosystems and weather patterns globally.
To address these problems, it is crucial for policymakers to encourage the reduction of car use. Governments should implement measures such as increasing taxes on car ownership, promoting alternative transportation methods, and investing in public transit infrastructure. Expanding public transportation options, like buses, trams, and trains, can provide viable alternatives to driving, thus reducing traffic congestion and emissions.
In conclusion, while cars offer undeniable benefits, their excessive use results in significant traffic and environmental problems. To mitigate these issues, it is advisable to adopt policies that discourage frequent car use and promote sustainable transportation options. This approach will contribute to improved air quality and reduced traffic congestion, ultimately benefiting society as a whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-06 | junii | 89 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | junii | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | claraa_ltn | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-04 | gagandeep@13 | 84 | view |
| 2020-11-01 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
- Student center is assumed as a new approach in education What are benefits of this approach 78
- Some people think that it is more important to teach children the literature of their own country than in other countries Do you agree or disagree 89
- The unlimited use of cars may have many problems What are those problems In order to reduce the problems should we discourage people to use cars 89
- Some people believe that professionals such as doctors and engineers should be required to work in the country where they did their training Others believed they should be free to work in other countries Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that if a country is already rich any addition in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: N
n contemporary society, the affordability...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, similarly, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.07023411371 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26986667211 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638795986622 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6768058047 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.764705882 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64705882353 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214875017613 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661020311216 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576377072215 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125585630209 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627645459343 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.63 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.