The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
The given bar chart depicts the results of an investigation of people’s coffee and tea purchasing and drinking habits over last 4 weeks in five different Australian cities.
Overall, most of Australian in five cities went to coffee or tea shop to drink directly in last 4 weeks, while fresh coffee was less chosen by individuals compared to instant coffee which was more prevalent to the citizen in city dwellers in Australia.
Regarding the percentage of city residents serving coffee or tea directly at shop in last 4 weeks, Melbourne and Hobart shared the same percentage of city residents going to a café for coffee or tea, at 64%, which was the highest among other demographics, followed by Sydney with 61% of citizens drinking coffee or tea directly at the coffee or tea shop. For Brisbane and Adelaide, going to café for coffee or tea was less popular in those two cities with respective figures being 55% and 49%.
Turning to the remaining habit of purchasing and drinking coffee or tea, buying instant coffee was the prevalent trend for Australian city dwellers in five urban areas over last 4 weeks with 54% for Hobart, 53% for Brisbane and 50% for Adelaide, both Sydney and Melbourne were recorded under 50%. In terms of the habit of Australian city residents purchasing and drinking fresh coffee in 4 previous weeks in five cities, it was recorded lower figures with 44% for Sydney and 41% for Melbourne, the remaining cities was all recorded under 45%.
- Some experts suggest that when a country is already rich any additional increase in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 78
- Some people believe that in a city the best way to travel is by car while other people argue that bicycles are a better way of travelling in a city 73
- Today many people do not know their neighbors Why is this What can be done about this 78
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wher 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 308, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rne were recorded under 50%. In terms of the habit of Australian city residents p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, well, while
/var/www/anaconda2/lib/python2.7/site-packages/vaderSentiment/vaderSentiment.py:242: UnicodeWarning: Unicode equal comparison failed to convert both arguments to Unicode - interpreting them as being unequal
if chr in self.emojis:
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8764940239 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56775921896 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446215139442 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 358.2 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 22.4926829268 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.8996213867 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 204.0 112.824112599 181% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.8333333333 22.9334400587 182% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338005421272 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205348970346 0.103423049105 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791907415772 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246913097947 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645087703597 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.5 13.2329268293 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 10.9970731707 167% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.