The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts depict the percentage of three distinct groups of water consumption in six countries of the world.
The initial impression is that, all countries except North America and Europe used majority of water for agriculture. Domestic has the lowest percentage among different areas except in South America.
As can be seen, industrial countries like North America and Europe have used water for their industries in order almost half percent and more than half percent (48%, and 53%). In other nations this proportion was less than 13%. Other third world countries have consumed water for agriculture more than 71% and domestic used not more significant except in South America by 19 percent. Africa and Central Asia did allocate consume water approximately 16%. South America is a big country and lots of people live there and used water for their domestic works by 19 percent that has the highest percentage among all other nations.
In conclusion, most of water was used for agriculture which is the main product of these countries.
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 73
- the pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 624, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...est percentage among all other nations. In conclusion, most of water was used fo...
^^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is the main product of these countries.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11695906433 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54222573056 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567251461988 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8037744176 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2222222222 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199459510108 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941163940371 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524561238773 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14583425543 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258964958551 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.