The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015
The chart illustrates the amount of waste collected by a recycling center between 2011 and 2015, divided into four categories: paper, glass, tins, and garden waste. Overall, the recycling center witnessed a substantial increase in waste collection across all categories, with paper waste consistently dominating the figures while garden waste remained the lowest.
Paper waste collection began at 57 tons in 2011, experiencing a notable decrease to 48 tons in 2012 and 2013. However, it rebounded to 51 tons in 2014 and reached a peak of 70 tons in 2015. Glass waste collection followed a similar trend, starting at 48 tons in 2011, decreasing slightly to 41 tons in 2012, and then recovering to its initial level in 2013. From 2013 onwards, glass waste fluctuated between 48 and 52 tons.
Tin waste collection exhibited a steady increase over the period, ranging from 27 to 33 tons and reaching 39 tons in 2015. Garden waste, on the other hand, started at 30 tons in 2011, halved in 2012, and then rebounded to 31 tons in 2013, eventually reaching 35 tons in 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 67
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better like swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Research shows that some activities are good for health and others are bad Despite knowing that millions of people engage in unhealthy activities What is the cause of this What can be done 56
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below shows the number of temporary migrant worker in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 Summarise the information by selecti 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 891.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9226519337 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68752588768 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569060773481 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2030091545 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.375 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27201570812 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138790723781 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0705251485895 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199114022865 0.15604864568 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659793306345 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.