Authorities should prioritize addressing present-day issues over anticipating and planning for future dilemmas.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The prioritizing of present-day problem is very important. This strategy will allow authorities to completely focus on maximizing the resources to cater for the issues that are ravaging the community, or a society; But, the authorities should not do this, and completely lose cite of tomorrow's dilemma, because the very actions of today are influencing, directly or even indirectly problems that would be faced tomorrow.
The advent of Hydrocarbon was a revolutionary; With it, the world now has cheap energy (relative to other sources of energy), and it byproducts, such as bitumen, are being employed in various sectors of life. There is no gainsay that hydrocarbons have ultimately made our lives easier. However, the very reason we are faced with issues such as climate crisis, and the prophesy that hydrocarbon in the ground will soon be exhausted, shows how the authorities of the time did not holistically consider the future implications of full dependence on hydrocarbon, as well as the method of extraction. This shortsightedness and share euphoria of just having enough energy, blindsided many, and consequences such as flaring, were seen asa norm, that had no solution, till years later, when we started seeing the effects of flaring on our ozone layer, at which point, it was almost too late.
Plastics too, which can both be gotten from rubber tree, or Hydrocarbon, present us a plethora of important byproducts. From single-use plastics, to its application in sectors such as clothing and textile, appliances such as blenders, to the production of more complex materials, just because of the good ratio of strength to weight provided by plastics. Now, due to the cost and heavily focusing on the temporal and immediate satisfaction of single use plastics,the effect of the pervasive use of plastics can be seen in our water bodies, drainages, and even ending up in our bodies. We failed to consider the implications of the non-biodegradable nature of plastics, putting us in a situation now, where by we clamour for remedial solutions.
Some might speciously argue that we would face these issues regardless. In as much as there is some truth to this, especially in the aspects of plastics, the scrupulous analysis of the effect of these 'solutions' would have helped us adopt what a 'cradle-to-cradle' approach. This simply means a cyclic application of resources, and not just the temporal application. Thus, the effect and consequences would not be grave today.
Conclusively, authorities can focus on the present-day issue, but must not lose sight of the consequences of these strategies and actions tomorrow, so as to avoid them turning insurmountable. We should never lose sight that our actions today, determines if we actually have tomorrow
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-07 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 83 | view |
- Authorities should prioritize addressing present day issues over anticipating and planning for future dilemmas Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sur 83
- Education systems should focus more on imparting practical skills than on teaching theoretical knowledge Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you tak 53
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 730, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sequences such as flaring, were seen asa norm, that had no solution, till years l...
^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: GOT_GOTTEN[1]
Message: In the UK, the word 'gotten' is usually no longer used. Did you mean 'got'?
Suggestion: got
...te. Plastics too, which can both be gotten from rubber tree, or Hydrocarbon, prese...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,
...iate satisfaction of single use plastics,the effect of the pervasive use of plast...
^
Line 5, column 701, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereby'?
Suggestion: whereby
...lastics, putting us in a situation now, where by we clamour for remedial solutions. S...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 149, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... these strategies and actions tomorrow, so as to avoid them turning insurmountable. We s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, so, thus, well, as to, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2325.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22471910112 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10785298201 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555056179775 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.1217071565 60.3974514979 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.3125 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8125 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117264771595 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399649990061 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380470309368 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654812730708 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358146039178 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.1392134831 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 730, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sequences such as flaring, were seen asa norm, that had no solution, till years l...
^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: GOT_GOTTEN[1]
Message: In the UK, the word 'gotten' is usually no longer used. Did you mean 'got'?
Suggestion: got
...te. Plastics too, which can both be gotten from rubber tree, or Hydrocarbon, prese...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,
...iate satisfaction of single use plastics,the effect of the pervasive use of plast...
^
Line 5, column 701, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereby'?
Suggestion: whereby
...lastics, putting us in a situation now, where by we clamour for remedial solutions. S...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 149, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... these strategies and actions tomorrow, so as to avoid them turning insurmountable. We s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, however, if, so, thus, well, as to, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2325.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22471910112 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10785298201 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555056179775 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 719.1 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.1217071565 60.3974514979 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.3125 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8125 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117264771595 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399649990061 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380470309368 0.0758088955206 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654812730708 0.150359130593 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358146039178 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.1392134831 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.