The best way to produce a happier society is to ensure that there are only small differences between the richest and poorest member. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
Over the past decade, happier society is the important things to development country. There are many people think that the best way to produce happier ski is reduce the differences between wealthy and un-wealthy people. For me, if country want do that they need to support many things for poorest people. Personally, this approach is definitely desirable but not necessary the one and only potion.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of people believed that ensure only small differences can create happier society. First, government subsidies for living conditions are believed to equalize working and learning opportunities among people regardless of their family background. This final support, presumably tends not only to increase the overall enrollment rate of lower-income people but also to mitigate their feeling of inferiority, which promotes an egalitarian society . Second, reduce the differences between poorest and richest people would probably result in a greater supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that happiness and equality human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the minor benefits once procedure happier society and government need to support many things as money or housing. First, give many things for poorest people that can make a small differences with richest people would likely correspond with a tremendous strain on a country. Generating no income from product, fees or tuition, company and school could become over-reliant on the state budget do funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, reduce small differences tends many young people including those who are not academically inclined or show no interest in development country because they know government supporting thereby adding great burden for government and staff and potentially wasting time that these young people could have spent their time for trying. It, instead, would be less happier society viable option if the resources were focused on supporting poor families who make positive contributions and who try hard.
In conclusion, create happier society could make people more comfortable and loving each others. However, disadvantages could outweigh for government burdens. In my opinion, country need to consider about the best way to make happier society in this modern life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The two maps illustrate the changes of a school campus from 1995 to 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries Why Effects on society 89
- Table The price of a cup of coffee in six cities from 2010 to 2014 in Australia 61
- The charts show the types of books sold by bestsellers between 1972 and 2012 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 488, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y, which promotes an egalitarian society . Second, reduce the differences between ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2188.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61025641026 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81992013283 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8923113286 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.705882353 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9411764706 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216542826535 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732655966166 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609789026976 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145586695746 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413450462972 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.