Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
If the various sciences-astronomy, biochemistry, physics- can be funded by the government then why can't arts be funded? Every action has some auspicious and some inauspicious consequences. Similarly the government funding of arts has both effects, but the merits far surpasses the demerits. Hence i agree with those people who are convinced that the government funding is imperative to ensure that the arts can flourish.
The first reasoning behind my claim is that the "Starving artists" is not just a adage rather its an real-life phenomena. Thousands of artists nowadays are poverty-stricken, not due to the lack of skill but because of insufficient awareness of the arts. There are only limited people in the world who not only appreciates arts but can also afford it. Most of the general public are unaware of the artist or artists work. As a result, these aspiring artists find it difficult to sell their works. Government funding can help ameliorate this situation. If the destitute but talented artists are to receive grants from the government, then they can strive to achieve greatness without facing the trepidation of death daily.
The second reason is the general publics lack of understanding of the arts. The general populace doesn't even have an modicum of knowledge regarding the arts. Organizing free art exhibition or establishing more people friendly museums are steps that can help garner the attention of the masses which subsequently leads to burgeoning of arts . However such steps require enormous amount of capital. The governments contribution can hence solve such problems which hinder the development of the arts.
Finally consider the people with latent talent. In modern world there are only few universities or institutions that provide arts education. Moreover this institutions are not cheap; they require heavy payment. Due to such conditions - either lack of institutions or finances - people with the untapped potential can't realize their own ability. Maybe many Vincent Van Gogh or Monet remain undiscovered because of the very same reason. In such scenario, governments endowment can be be crucial. The funds can initiate free courses or launch scholarship programs. Such initiatives are requisite for the flourishing of arts.
On the contrary the government funding can also threaten the integrity of the arts. The integrity of arts depends on it's being free from interference. Because of the support ,the artists sometimes becomes complaisant to government. Some artists will then create art only to cater to the governments needs. They may do so by suppressing their inner self ; this can have far reaching implications. Perhaps if he had followed his true passion then he could have engendered a masterpiece. Such cases show that the government can seriously jeopardize the artists integrity.
The evaluation all the varied opinions , either in favor of government funding or against, and also analyzing the reasoning behind those opinions led to the conclusion that the though there are few unpropitious repercussions , the benefits are far too many. Hence i agree with those people who believe that government funding can help in ensuring the thriving of arts.
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with 80
- Humans arrived in the Kaliko Islands about 7,000 years ago, and within 3,000 years most of the large mammal species that had lived in the forests of the Kaliko Islands were extinct. Previous archaeological findings have suggested that early humans general 88
- Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future. 80
- Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 75
- some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society, especially among children. Others believe that the children's peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on children 70
Moreover this institutions are not cheap
Moreover these institutions are not cheap
the artists sometimes becomes complaisant to government.
the artists sometimes become complaisant to government.
The evaluation all the varied opinions
The evaluation to all the varied opinions
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 33 15
No. of Words: 507 350
No. of Characters: 2642 1500
No. of Different Words: 268 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.745 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.211 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.888 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 194 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 154 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 104 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 78 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.364 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.764 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.606 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.265 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.455 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.061 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5